|
|
From: Linus Torvalds <torva...@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Linux 2.0 really _is_ released..
Date: 1996/06/09
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960609191250.6321C-100000@linux.cs.Helsinki.FI>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 159433480
sender: owner-linux-ker...@vger.rutgers.edu
references: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960609085622.31635A-100000@linux.cs.Helsinki.FI>
content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
x-hdr-sender: torva...@cs.helsinki.fi
mime-version: 1.0
x-env-sender: owner-linux-kernel-outgo...@vger.rutgers.edu
newsgroups: linux.dev.kernel
Ok, I took the plunge, and Linux-2.0 is out there on the normal sites. I even
got the energy to write some inane announcement about it on cola, so it's too
late to chicken out any more.
The changes from pre2.0.14:
- Various minor TCP fixes (Eric Schenk), hopefully the "stuck in
SYN_SENT" thing is gone, and delayed acks might be a bit more clever.
- various debugging messages turned off.. (yes, finally the "socket
destroy delayed" message is gone ;-)
- ISDN fixes
- Logo included (but it's not in the patch, as it's a binary .gif file)
- alpha updates for CIA-based machines (those DEC people either have a
strange sense of humor, or are totally clueless. I don't know which).
- arcnet and eexpress driver fixes
- SCSI should compile without /proc support (not that I've tested: sue
me)
- aha152x update
- initrd root unmount fix
Now I'm going to zonk out for a few days, and then I'll skip the country and
go to Argentina for a while. So while you struggle with the new kernel, you
can feel safe in the thought that I won't care in the least. Because I'm
taking a VACATION!
Linus
|
|
|
|
SCO's Case Against IBM
November 12, 2003 - Jed Boal from Eyewitness News KSL 5 TV provides an
overview on SCO's case against IBM. Darl McBride, SCO's president and CEO,
talks about the lawsuit's impact and attacks. Jason Holt, student and
Linux user, talks about the benefits of code availability and the merits
of the SCO vs IBM lawsuit. See SCO vs IBM.
|
|
|
|
|
Note: The materials and information included in these Web pages are not to
be used for any other purpose other than private study, research, review
or criticism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|