|
|
From: haible@ma2s2.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de (Bruno Haible)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.announce
Subject: System V filesystem
Date: 1 Dec 1993 00:43:53 +0200
Approved: linux-announce@tc.cornell.edu (Lars Wirzenius)
Message-ID: <2dgib9$2na@klaava.Helsinki.FI>
Sysvfs is an implementation of the System V and Coherent and Xenix
filesystems for Linux. It grew out of separate filesystem implementations
Xenix FS Doug Evans < dje@cygnus.com> June 1992
SystemV FS Paul B. Monday < pmonday@eecs.wsu.edu> March-June 1993
Coherent FS Pascal Haible < haible@izfm.uni-stuttgart.de> and
B. Haible < haible@ma2s2.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de> June 1993
and was merged together in July 1993.
Version 5 has been uploaded to
ma2s2.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de /pub/linux/sysvfs/
sunsite.unc.edu /pub/Linux/Incoming/
soon /pub/Linux/system/Filesystems/sysv/
There is a separate set of kernel patches for each Linux kernel from
0.99.10 to 0.99.14.
It implements all kinds of System V like filesystems I know of (but not UFS).
If you are running a System V or Coherent or Xenix, this should make it
easier for you to move to Linux.
mkfs.sysv and fsck.sysv are not provided. The hard disk partitioning scheme
of Xenix requires separate patches.
*** Use at your own risk. ***
*** Backup your disk before using it for the first time. ***
*** Mount read-only the first time. ***
Bruno Haible
< haible@ma2s2.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de>
--
Mail submissions for comp.os.linux.announce to: linux-announce@tc.cornell.edu
PLEASE remember Keywords: and a short description of the software.
|
|
|
|
SCO's Case Against IBM
November 12, 2003 - Jed Boal from Eyewitness News KSL 5 TV provides an
overview on SCO's case against IBM. Darl McBride, SCO's president and CEO,
talks about the lawsuit's impact and attacks. Jason Holt, student and
Linux user, talks about the benefits of code availability and the merits
of the SCO vs IBM lawsuit. See SCO vs IBM.
|
|
|
|
|
Note: The materials and information included in these Web pages are not to
be used for any other purpose other than private study, research, review
or criticism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|