Re: Statement from SGI about Inventor

Kevin Goldsmith (kmg@monk.colossal.com)
Mon, 27 Jun 1994 18:19:10 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Dave Raggett: "Re: Some criteria for VRML"
Previous message: burchard@geom.umn.edu: "Re: Statement from SGI about Inventor"

On Jun 27, 7:14pm, burchard@geom.umn.edu wrote:
> Subject: Re: Statement from SGI about Inventor
> On Fri, 24 Jun 1994, David Cake wrote:
> > I guess we have our answer. Now we might actually have to look at
> > Inventor on technical grounds.
>
> Based on the documentation I was able to grab from SGI, it seems that
> the SGO format is a binary-only format, and supports only quad lists,
> triangle lists, and triangle meshes (with a bunch of appearance
> attributes). Am I missing something?
>
> PB
>-- End of excerpt from burchard@geom.umn.edu

SGO != Inventor

Kevin

Next message: Dave Raggett: "Re: Some criteria for VRML"
Previous message: burchard@geom.umn.edu: "Re: Statement from SGI about Inventor"