I question this assumption. *If* our definition of a space is a full
description of the image, with all the details, then you're right that
it'll be a while before the bandwidth catches up (saying that the net
will *never* be fast enough is playing with fire, in my experience).
But that's probably not the right model. As many people have said here,
the best way to do it is probably with some combination of local models
of objects, plus remote descriptions of how to associate those objects,
maybe with incremental filling in of the details as objects get closer.
That doesn't necessarily require all *that* much bandwidth...
-- Justin
Random Quote du Jour:
What They Say: What They Mean:
"We need to massage the numbers a bit." "We want to raise the price a lot."