Mark,
You bet your bippy we will be thinking about sound for VRML. Hang on a
little bit longer, until Brian and Mark kick off the list next week.
Then we'll talk.
>
> I'm on here for a number of reasons, among which is my concern as to
> whether audio information will be included into any definition of VRML.
> As you can guess from my background, I think that sound is one of the two
> senses that we can communicate effectively using current technology, and
> that therefore audio ought to be included. Beyond this I have a number of
> ideas, but I wanted to make sure that this first question was resolved.
>
> I'd like to hear what you all think about this.
>
> Regards to all
> --mark
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
tony parisi
dagobert@netcom.com "In cyberspace, no one can hear you type"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------