Re: Sound in VRML / Yet another introduction

Anthony Parisi (dagobert@netcom.com)
Fri, 10 Jun 1994 13:35:34 -0700 (PDT)


[Ok, I'm trying to help keep this list traffic down, but I can't resist...]

Mark,

You bet your bippy we will be thinking about sound for VRML. Hang on a
little bit longer, until Brian and Mark kick off the list next week.
Then we'll talk.

>
> I'm on here for a number of reasons, among which is my concern as to
> whether audio information will be included into any definition of VRML.
> As you can guess from my background, I think that sound is one of the two
> senses that we can communicate effectively using current technology, and
> that therefore audio ought to be included. Beyond this I have a number of
> ideas, but I wanted to make sure that this first question was resolved.
>
> I'd like to hear what you all think about this.
>
> Regards to all
> --mark
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
tony parisi
dagobert@netcom.com "In cyberspace, no one can hear you type"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------