Re: BAD HTML flag [was: Re: Broken parsers need to be fixed (was Re: no dtd? no]

Rainer Klute (klute@nads.de)
Thu, 10 Aug 1995 09:30:51 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Hakon Lie: "CSS draft specification"
Previous message: Benjamin C. W. Sittler: "Re: BAD HTML flag [was: Re: Broken parsers need to be fixed (was Re: no dtd? no]"
In reply to: Benjamin C. W. Sittler: "Re: BAD HTML flag [was: Re: Broken parsers need to be fixed (was Re: no dtd? no]"
Next in thread: Hakon Lie: "Re: BAD HTML flag [was: Re: Broken parsers need to be fixed (was Re: no dtd? no]"

>In my experience people usually ignore Arena'a BAD HTML indicator, except
>for their own documents, where they find it of great service.

No, it isn't, because Arena does not have a real SGML parser and
may raise the "Bad HTML" flag for documents that are perfectly
valid HTML. Use an SGML parser instead.

Best regards
Rainer Klute

Dipl.-Inform. Rainer Klute NADS - Advertising on nets
NADS GmbH
Emil-Figge-Str. 80 Tel.: +49 231 9742570
D-44227 Dortmund Fax: +49 231 9742571

<http://www.nads.de/~klute/>

Next message: Hakon Lie: "CSS draft specification"
Previous message: Benjamin C. W. Sittler: "Re: BAD HTML flag [was: Re: Broken parsers need to be fixed (was Re: no dtd? no]"
In reply to: Benjamin C. W. Sittler: "Re: BAD HTML flag [was: Re: Broken parsers need to be fixed (was Re: no dtd? no]"
Next in thread: Hakon Lie: "Re: BAD HTML flag [was: Re: Broken parsers need to be fixed (was Re: no dtd? no]"