I don't think there's any actual proposal by that name. I think the
term HTTP++ was suggestive of an analogy with C/C++.
> By the way, can any one
> comment on HTTP-NG proposed by ETI? Is there a place for it in future
> or not?
Yes. We don't have a lot of public info on our HTTP-NG efforts, but they're
underway. For publicly available info on HTTP work at W3C, stay tuned to:
http://www.w3.org/hypertext/WWW/Protocols/
Dan