Re: The EMBED tag by Netscape (v2.0)

murray@sq.com
Tue, 19 Sep 1995 13:42:07 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Paul Phillips: "ANNOUNCE: The Boa webserver, v0.90"
Previous message: Claude Devarenne: "RE: returning state in a link"
In reply to: Ka-Ping Yee: "Re: The EMBED tag by Netscape (v2.0)"
Next in thread: Ka-Ping Yee: "Re: The EMBED tag by Netscape (v2.0)"

Ka-Ping Yee writes:
>
> Certainly we have no reason to accept EMBED. It is not part of the
> standard, and never needs to be.

Who is "we"? And why does EMBED never need to be in the spec?

The ability to do inclusion, via EMBED, is something that
has been asked for repeatedly for over a year now.

Murray

Murray Maloney
Product Manager
SoftQuad Inc.

Next message: Paul Phillips: "ANNOUNCE: The Boa webserver, v0.90"
Previous message: Claude Devarenne: "RE: returning state in a link"
In reply to: Ka-Ping Yee: "Re: The EMBED tag by Netscape (v2.0)"
Next in thread: Ka-Ping Yee: "Re: The EMBED tag by Netscape (v2.0)"