> Newer approaches involve having the document specify a polygon which
> constitute an anchor in an image, along with associated attributes (e.g.
> destination URL, REL or REV tags, that sort of disposition information.)
> That way, browsers can clearly indicate which part of the image is a valid link
> and which is not, where it goes, whether it should pop up in a separate window
> or replace what you're watching, etc.
>
> I'd suggest extending that to video by just adding a couple of attributes to
> the polygon (starting time and ending time, in frames or whatever.)
I guess one should consider giving _two_ polygons, one for time
t0 (start) and the other for t1 (stop) , and the actual hit area
would be linearly calculated from the two polygons. Using just one
polygon doesn't take into account the fact that the "camera"
usually moves.
Juha
>
>
>
Juha
--Juha Oinonen, joinonen@cs.joensuu.fi
X.400: /GN=joinonen/OU1=cs/O=joensuu/ADMD=FUMAIL/C=FI