> looks up the currently defined registrations for REL, not any of the
> eighteen or so listed types includes any mention of copyright.
Isn't it cool the way that works.
> In other words, I don't agree that the issue is clear. I don't see
> any standardized vehicle for a publisher of a document to express
> copyright except in human language or as an attached human language
> document.
I never said there was; I said, and I quote:
If you need additional structure for the data you can define a standard
data format and assign it a MIME type (e.g., application/x-copyright).
I mearly told you how to associate this data (in any format you desire)
with the document in question.
--sanders