I found the article(s) to be incoherent. There were a lot of facts and
half truths brought up, but there was very little to tie them all
together. There was no solution proposed; there wasn't even a
description of "the problem." He also never actually condemned the Web;
he merely repeated what many of us say (albeit inaccurately). And yet,
here on www-talk we seem very defensive. Why?
-Nick Kramer