Also, am I violating the copyright by posting the
copyright here? Is that considered part of the
message itself?
Mary Morris
----- Begin Included Message -----
>From marym Mon Jun 27 09:27 PDT 1994
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 1994 09:27:03 +0800
From: marym (Mary Morris)
To: davis@DRI.cornell.edu
Subject: Re: The Superhighway Steamroller
Cc: marym
> Nice answer. But I think you did not need to delete "per copyright"
> Hart's comments you were responding to. Wouldn't that fall under
> "fair use"? One can always quote from a copyrighted passage in
> order to review or discuss it. It made the letter harder to follow
> for those like me who haven't seen the originial.
The copyright says:
THIS MESSAGE IS A PRIVATE COMMUNICATION, INTENDED ONLY TO BE
READ BY THE PEOPLE TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED. RECIPIENTS OF
THIS MESSAGE MAY NOT COPY OR DISTRIBUTE IT IN WHOLE OR IN
PART WITHOUT MICHAEL HART'S WRITTEN PERMISSION, OTHER THAN
TO REPLY.
I read this to mean that since it didn't originally go
to the www-talk alias, I would not be replying. I don't have
full netnews up and running yet or I would have posted
the rebuttal to the original news group. If you know how
to post by mail I would appreciate that information.
I can understand copyrighting work, but I think that
this copyright went too far. Posting it to a newsgroup
makes it available for an audience of close to 10 million
or about half of the Internet community. Knowing who does
or doesn't have the ability to be a "recipient" is a
horribly gray area here.
I have written him to ask for permission to include
his text in my rebuttal.
Thanks.
Mary Morris
----- End Included Message -----