Well said.
> Hopefully there's a solution to this worry - enhancing and maintaining libwww
> might be the best way, as it would hopefully take care of common complex
> lower-level functions, and putting as much effort into high-level tools as
> possible (a product integrating a browser, editor, *and* server would be
> nice) would help too.
I think that this will take significantly more effort than hoping. :-) The
approach you outline is similar to my "sample" implementation proposal. I
agree that this is extremely useful --- it's worked out *extremely* well for X.
I believe the real solution is to segment HTML into separately implementable
pieces and then provide the glue to hold those pieces together. My first
article touches on this. If there's continued interest, I'll post a more
technical article detailing my approach to the problem. Who else is working
on this issue?
> Here's to the future.
>
> Brian
- Ken
-- Ken Fox, fox@pt0204.pto.ford.com, (313)59-44794 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ford Motor Company, Powertrain | "Is this some sort of trick question CAD/CAM/CAE Process Integration | or what?" -- Calvin AP Environment Section |