Re: Multiple objects in a single transaction: Making it more concrete

Ari Luotonen (luotonen@ptsun00.cern.ch)
Tue, 12 Apr 94 10:59:44 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Liam Relihan: "Re: Interest in HTML Conformance?"
Previous message: William M. Perry: "Interest in HTML Conformance?"
In reply to: Greg.R.Hardison@nola.mcdermott.com: "Re[2]: Mosaic version 2.0"
Next in thread: HALLAM-BAKER Phillip: "Re: Multiple objects in a single transaction: Making it more concrete"

> Does the proxy assume that any format available in the cache is
> preferable to all other formats? For example:

Yes, because it doesn't know it was a result of multiformat
negotiation -- in short, today's proxy doesn't understand the first
thing about multiformats but since it's not a widely used feature
it's not a burning issue. Once clients have multilanguage support
it will be.

-- Cheers, Ari --

Next message: Liam Relihan: "Re: Interest in HTML Conformance?"
Previous message: William M. Perry: "Interest in HTML Conformance?"
In reply to: Greg.R.Hardison@nola.mcdermott.com: "Re[2]: Mosaic version 2.0"
Next in thread: HALLAM-BAKER Phillip: "Re: Multiple objects in a single transaction: Making it more concrete"