Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that if someone wants to invent another
ENCTYPE, say text/sgml-www-form, then you can just use that as the
catch-all content-type instead of application/www-form-url-encoded.
But I guess the strong version of your thoughts is to require this new
SGML-based simple form value type, and bury www-form-url-encoded in
history.
I'm sure there are others who'll say "sure that would have been more
elegant, but why invent a new simple form format at this point?"
For my part, I like having the MIME encapsulation support either, then
we'll see what happens when the developers have at it.
Jay