According to the draft DTD for HTML+, the </a> end tag *is*
obligatory, unlike the </p>.
Since HTML+ will be defined by the DTD (unlike HTML, where a DTD was
added as an afterthought), there can be no "fuzzyness" in the syntax.
(Semantics is another matter.)
Btw., an HTML+ checker is nice, but why don't you use "sgmls"? It is
an SGML parser, so by implication it is also an HTML+ parser. In fact,
I use it routinely to check (and even generate!) the pages for our
soon to be announced WWW server.
Bert
-- _________________________________ / _ Bert Bos <bert@let.rug.nl> | () |/ \ Alfa-informatica, | \ |\_/ Rijksuniversiteit Groningen | \_____/| Postbus 716 | | 9700 AS GRONINGEN | | Nederland | \_________________________________|