After reading the draft I'm a bit confused where your proposal fits in.
If you want to have only server information (hardly usfeull IMHO) you
wouldn't need the "Index: " line, so I assume you are also after the
contents (URLs).
They correspond more to the "Document Abstracts" section of the IAFA
draft, and that proposes records with >1 fields, which is what I argued
for before (albeit with fields more specificly for a WWW context).
-- Martijn
__________
Internet: m.koster@nexor.co.uk
X-400: C=GB; A=Mark400; P=Nexor; O=Nexor; S=koster; I=M
X-500: c=GB@o=NEXOR@cn=Martijn Koster
WWW: http://web.nexor.co.uk/mak/mak.html