I think MUDs are great. A WWW<->MUD gateway would be even better.
Someone needs to write WWWmud that uses HTML to build the interface
(problem is MUD's are interactive, when are we going to have iHTML? :-)
Still it could be done with some compromises.
Anyone want to hack "ihttp://..." into their browser? :-)
> Lou Montulli writes:
>
> > I thought that the MUD idea was humorous :)
>
> Don't laugh -- MUDs are just a first cut at a simulated world (VR is
> such an over-used term), and they don't necessarily have to be filled
> with hacking and slashing. Indeed, I think you're about to find out
> how good they can be for:
> -- multiway chat,
> -- simple user-interfaces,
> and
> -- development.
>
> Nat