|
|
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!think!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!OKEEFFE.BERKELEY.EDU!bostic
From: bos...@OKEEFFE.BERKELEY.EDU (Keith Bostic)
Newsgroups: comp.bugs.4bsd.ucb-fixes
Subject: ARTICLE #1
Message-ID: <8703192040.AA13067@okeeffe.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Thu, 19-Mar-87 15:40:57 EST
Article-I.D.: okeeffe.8703192040.AA13067
Posted: Thu Mar 19 15:40:57 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 21-Mar-87 06:42:01 EST
Sender: dae...@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 21
Approved: ucb-fi...@okeeffe.berkeley.edu
Welcome to comp.bugs.4bsd.ucb-fixes. This is a moderated
newsgroup intended for "official" fixes to the current Berkeley
release. It will normally include only 4.3BSD fixes, although
4.2BSD fixes will be provided if the bug is of sufficient importance.
2.9BSD and 2.10BSD fixes will remain in comp.bugs.2bsd.
If at all possible, postings will be diff listings from the
released source, not from intermediate sources. Postings will be
sequentially numbered and missed postings may be requested from the
moderator.
Bug reports should not be posted to this newsgroup. As before,
bug reports should be forwarded to "4bsd-b...@ucbvax.berkeley.edu", or,
for UUCP sites, to "ucbvax!bugs". Bugs sent to those addresses will be
posted to this newsgroup when they have been evaluated and fixed.
Since Berkeley hasn't done anything like this before, we would
appreciate any suggestions from the user community.
Keith Bostic
seismo!keith
bos...@ucbvax.berkeley.edu
|
|
|
|
SCO's Case Against IBM
November 12, 2003 - Jed Boal from Eyewitness News KSL 5 TV provides an
overview on SCO's case against IBM. Darl McBride, SCO's president and CEO,
talks about the lawsuit's impact and attacks. Jason Holt, student and
Linux user, talks about the benefits of code availability and the merits
of the SCO vs IBM lawsuit. See SCO vs IBM.
|
|
|
|
|
Note: The materials and information included in these Web pages are not to
be used for any other purpose other than private study, research, review
or criticism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|