|
|
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 12/21/84; site seismo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!keith
From: ke...@seismo.UUCP (Keith Bostic)
Newsgroups: net.usenix,net.bugs.2bsd
Subject: 2.9 BSD BOF (BFD)
Message-ID: <145@seismo.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 15-Jan-85 12:10:32 EST
Article-I.D.: seismo.145
Posted: Tue Jan 15 12:10:32 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 16-Jan-85 05:49:07 EST
Organization: Center for Seismic Studies, Arlington, VA
Lines: 36
There will be a 2.9 BSD BOF at USENIX
on Thursday evening, the 24th, from 7-9.
What I'm personally interested in:
-- How do we get all of the fixes that are floating around
integrated?
-- Will Berkeley ever do a 3.0, and if not, can we take a
version that has the basic networking kernal running
and have them distribute it rather than the current release?
-- Does anybody feel like porting the 4.2 networking to 2.9?
-- Various bug fixes and random flammage on how to get the
talk program working.
Special Events:
-- There will be prizes for the longest and shortest time taken
to find the mapping bug in machdep.c. (Figured, of course,
from the first "trap type 11" when you attempted to boot.)
-- There will be two doorprizes of fixed param.h's, allowing you
to compile the *entire* networking code!
So... if you have the answers to these (or any other) questions...
if you have some questions of your own...
if you just want to talk about 2.9...
if you have a younger sister named Cheryl Tiegs...
drop on by!
Keith Bostic
ARPA: keith@seismo
UUCP: seismo!keith
|
|
|
|
SCO's Case Against IBM
November 12, 2003 - Jed Boal from Eyewitness News KSL 5 TV provides an
overview on SCO's case against IBM. Darl McBride, SCO's president and CEO,
talks about the lawsuit's impact and attacks. Jason Holt, student and
Linux user, talks about the benefits of code availability and the merits
of the SCO vs IBM lawsuit. See SCO vs IBM.
|
|
|
|
|
Note: The materials and information included in these Web pages are not to
be used for any other purpose other than private study, research, review
or criticism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|